West Papua Genocide – It is rather disappointing for us, Papuans, when the wrestle for West Papua Freedom and human rights, which has been introduced up by the United Liberation Motion of West Papua (ULMWP) and any group that carries the umbrella of the Free Papua Group (Organisasi Papua Merdeka or OPM), didn’t get consideration on the 2018 Common Meeting of the United Nations.
West Papua Freedom activists overseas and home, political students, and political observers of Papua have beforehand acknowledged that this yr’s Common Meeting of the UN agenda will embody the Papuan wrestle. They anticipated that there could be a critical debate between the Papuans within the Indonesian delegation and the Papuans within the Vanuatu delegation. The discuss of those folks solely provides false hopes to different Papuans. – west papua genocide
Why? The 39th Human Rights Session led by the Excessive Commissioner of Human Rights of the United Nations, Michelle Bachelet, befell peacefully; nearly too quiet. Cross-debates and arguments between UN member nations that had been anticipated to achieve numerous consideration for West Papua freedom didn’t occur. The issue of the West Papua independence wrestle and human rights violations campaigned by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) had been additionally not included within the Common Meeting agenda.
The UN Common Meeting is the best worldwide convention held yearly from September to October. This meeting presents all UN members. Sadly, on the session led by Excessive Commissioner Michelle Bachelet, there was no Papuan title within the introductory speech and dialogue of the meeting agenda; not to mention a point out on the issue of human rights violations which have occurred in Papua. Whereas many points are categorized as Severe Crimes in opposition to Humanity within the Wasior, Biak Berdarah, Paniai/Enarotali, and others; there have even been petitions signed by a couple of and a half million Papuans. Nonetheless, West Papua freedom remained a silent matter all through the Meeting. – west papua genocide.
Severe questions come up. The place are the West Papua battle which have been raised by ULMWP and different OPM? On account of these points, there have been many repressive actions, arrests, imprisonment in Papua. Are they mistaken in addressing the issue? Alternatively, have not they ship the problems to the UN discussion board? Has this West Papua freedom grow to be a political commodity to boost funds for sure teams at dwelling and overseas?
For these of us who reside in Papua, is independence simply an phantasm that arises from limitations, the stress of being deprived, which then drives the need for West Papua freedom to reside life? Is it true that we miss Papua that’s bodily unbiased, standing within the type of its personal nation? Will we scream due to our restricted data and skill to penetrate the political wall, which has lengthy left the problem of independence, and as a substitute prioritizes issues that have an effect on peace, safety, and the welfare of humanity? This occasion may be very disappointing and tiring.
Why is there all the time a rumor yearly that the Common Meeting of the UN and the Human Rights Session led by Excessive Commissioner herself will embody the West Papua freedom? It was very disappointing, the human rights issues and the needs of freedom the Papuans skilled didn’t obtain consideration within the Common Meeting. Although Excessive Commissioner Michelle Bachelet has talked about some names of countries and areas on this planet that want particular consideration from the United Nations due to extreme human rights violations. Within the record, the title of Indonesia is just not even registered.
Is not this downside extreme? We should always query the place the Papuan human rights points have gone, in addition to West Papua independence calls for. These two issues ought to have been conveyed by those that fought on behalf of the OPM corresponding to ULMWP, Kobe Oser, Herman Wanggai as representatives of Papua on the UN, Ben Kaisiepo who referred to as himself the Melanesian West Papua President and has an workplace on the United Nations. The place are these points delivered? Within the quiet Common Meeting, there was not even a single Papua title referred to as; particularly the problem of Free Papua.
The reply to the issue of no point out of the West Papua freedom within the Common Meeting on the UN is key; a chronological rationalization is required in order that the query turns into clear. All processes and procedures that apply within the Common Meeting adjust to worldwide protocol procedures. The official UN commonplace process acknowledged that the Common Meeting contributors are representatives of UN member states, and contributors from the nation’s delegation have to be registered to affix the discussion board. Every member nation has the rights to talk on the ground and rights to answer whose main situation is to not criticize and intrude with the sovereignty of every state.
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), World Church Communities, OPM, ULMWP, numerous organizations, and particular person representatives can’t convey the West Papua freedom and the human rights violations that comply with it as a result of Papua is just not a sovereign state. The Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is the one sovereign nation and a member of the United Nations that has the correct to speak the issue of Papua, not Vanuatu, which has all the time raised its voice.
Vanuatu has used the correct to talk on the ground to hold its essential and difficult home issues, their views on the dealing with of the worldwide disaster, and their dedication to world peace; West Papua freedom points solely briefly conveyed with out debate motions or voting. The absence of debate was as a result of the Common Meeting protocol system solely permits Indonesia to make use of its proper to answer to Vanuatu’s assertion concerning Papua.
Vanuatu used its second proper to answer to reiterate human rights violations in West Papua and repeat its calls for to Indonesia. They requested Indonesia to instantly cease the abuses and enchantment for worldwide help to induce Indonesia to open an investigation into the alleged human rights violations and for speaking about West Papua freedom. Vanuatu additionally expressed its opinion on the standing of Papua to be included within the record of colonization areas in response to UN guidelines.
On the 2018 Common Meeting of the UN, Indonesian Vice President Jusuf Kalla expressed Indonesia’s dedication, in its capability as a Non-Everlasting Member of the UN Safety Council, to supply greater than 4000 peace military personnel. Different UN member states delegations warmly welcomed this speech. The response was completely different with when Vanuatu talked about somewhat about West Papua freedom.
Indonesia’s first proper to answer was then delivered by the Ambassador of the Republic of Indonesia to the United Nations Dian Triansyah Djani. In his discourse, Djani stated that Vanuatu’s speech about West Papua freedom had violated the ideas and worldwide legislation adopted by the United Nations, and unfold international hatred for Indonesia. Vanuatu’s violation was by interfering in Indonesian sovereignty. Vanuatu believes false information campaigned by a handful of Papuans and NGOs; information that claims that there’s a homicide in Papua every single day.
In Indonesia’s second proper to answer, Djani instructed the Common Meeting and the Vanuatu delegation about the actual circumstances in West Papua, Indonesia’s dedication to proceed to develop its two japanese provinces, meet the essential wants of Papuan folks, enhance well being providers and training. All of this corresponds to the eight Millennium Objectives set by the United Nations.
It seems that there usually are not a thousand roads to Rome, neither is there a thousand roads to the Common Meeting of the UN. There are solely worldwide protocol techniques and procedures agreed upon by UN member states. This method has been adopted in a UN decision which states that those that have the correct to attend the Common Meeting are representatives of the sovereign member states of the United Nations.
Let the actual world work in response to the relevant guidelines. We need not imagine within the phantasm and fantasy of our on-line world. We need not imagine in messianic actions that attempt to idiot us. It’s as if God will be regulated by us, the Indonesian folks, particularly the Papuans.
Allow us to try for our rights within the official corridors of nationwide and worldwide politics, that are acknowledged by the constitutional system, via the common authorized channels. The Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia ensures all authorized actions in response to worldwide legislation and human rights.
I hope this writing can present readers with the data to understand that the West Papua freedom wrestle is just not as simple as turning the palm. Free Papua is intently associated to all worldwide authorized processes, procedures, and legal guidelines which have been adopted collectively by all UN member states. In Free Papua’s political endeavor, there’s a vital impediment, which is the Decision 2505 regarding the Integration of Papua into the Republic of Indonesia. After passing via this hindrance, the remaining is our try to show the huge ocean into contemporary water.
Papuan Socio-Political Observer
Norotouw, John AL. (2018, October 09). Sesi HAM ke-39 pada Sidang Umum PBB Nyaris Sepi. Retrieved from Cenderawasih Pos.